On this page
Final chart, with its own labels
On a narrow screen, scroll sideways to see every column.
| Tier label | Fighters |
|---|---|
| JFK | JFK |
| S | Biden, Obama, Nixon, Andrew Jackson |
| A | Washington, Teddy Roosevelt, Magical Girl Trump |
| B | Taft, Robo Roosevelt |
| D | Lincoln |
| F | Empty in the final chart |
The table follows the visible final chart, not a guessed tier from phrases such as “put him here.” For example, the spoken Jackson discussion proposes top A, while the final chart shows him in S. The authors also discuss moving Lincoln; their ending chart is the placement reported above. No within-tier ordering is asserted here.
Sources: [1]
What the authors use to judge each fighter
On a narrow screen, scroll sideways to see every column.
| Fighter | Author’s stated reason / uncertainty |
|---|---|
| JFK | A separate top label; the closing discussion emphasizes the one-hit grab threat |
| Biden | They emphasize the prepared 100% Blast threat (0:44–1:24), while one speaker notes being a Biden main |
| Jackson | Pistol pressure and predictions (1:27–1:54); the spoken tier suggestion differs from the final graphic |
| Lincoln | They place him lowest while still calling the roster playable; one later remarks he might be higher (1:56–2:16; 6:29) |
| Magical Girl Trump | Weak base form versus the stronger transformed kit, with transformation required (2:18–2:47) |
| Nixon | Stone upgrades and the finishing super; the authors discuss low S (2:50–3:31) |
| Obama | Speed Up and super threat; they also speculate about future changes (3:32–4:03) |
| Robo Roosevelt | Potential but limited player representation in their discussion (4:06–4:30) |
| Taft | Movement against a large hitbox and specific matchup concerns (4:32–5:08) |
| Teddy Roosevelt | Speed and defensive options, qualified by vulnerability to skilled projectile play (5:11–5:46) |
| Washington | Full-screen rifle pressure, stun and Revolutionary Rain; the authors also choose a visually stepped chart (5:48–6:18) |
Those are attributed judgments, not verified win rates or official matchup ratings. Assertions about tournament bans, controller requirements or guaranteed supers in the conversation are not adopted as game facts.
Sources: [1]
Use this as an opinion snapshot
The discussion weighs movement, projectile pressure, resource payoff, super threat and personal experience. It does not publish a scoring formula, controlled match sample, fixed skill bracket or complete tournament results. The speakers explicitly want a stepped-looking chart; that is one reason not to read the tier distances as measured differences.
Older June templates predate the later roster additions and are not merged into a fabricated before/after balance trend. The video’s anticipated nerfs remain speculation without a matching developer patch. Choose a fighter guide for inputs, or create your own labelled ranking for your mode and build.
Sources: [1]
Sources & version scope
This guide synthesizes the listed sources. Community transcriptions and opinions remain attributed; source checks are separate from hands-on game testing.
- Dp5layer: September 2026 ranking video, final chart at 6:40Source reviewed 2026-10-12.